Wednesday, April 09, 2008

Hillary's 'Fraudulent' Watergate Brief Confirmed

Hillary's 'Fraudulent' Watergate Brief Confirmed WND

Clinton was fired for allegedly colluding with Kennedys to protect JFK legacy.

Details of Hillary Clinton's firing from the House Judiciary Committee staff for unethical behavior as she helped prepare articles of impeachment against Richard Nixon have been confirmed by the panel's chief Republican counsel.

Franklin Polk backed up major claims by Jerry Zeifman, the general counsel and chief of staff of the House Judiciary Committee who supervised Clinton's work on the Watergate investigation in 1974, reported columnist Dan Calabrese in a column republished by WND.

Zeifman, a lifelong Democrat, called Clinton a "liar" and "an unethical, dishonest lawyer." He contends Clinton was collaborating with allies of the Kennedys to block revelation of Kennedy-administration activities that made Watergate "look like a day at the beach." Her brief, Zeifman said, was so fraudulent and ridiculous, she would have been disbarred if she had submitted it to a judge.

Polk confirmed Clinton wrote a brief arguing Nixon should not be granted legal counsel due to a lack of precedent. But Clinton deliberately ignored the then-recent case of Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas, who was allowed to have a lawyer during the impeachment attempt against him in 1970.

Moreover, Zeifman claims Clinton bolstered her fraudulent brief by removing all of the Douglas files from public access and storing them at her office, enabling her to argue as if the case never existed.Polk confirmed the Clinton memo ignored the Douglas case, but he could not confirm or dispel the claim that Hillary removed the files.

Looking back on the case amid Clinton's fierce battle with Sen. Barack Obama for the Democratic presidential nomination, Calabrese sees a picture emerging "of a very ambitious young lawyer who was eager to please her political patrons, and was willing to mislead and undermine established committee staff and senior committee members in order to do so."

The columnist, editor in chief of the North Star Writers Group, noted Zeifman has been "trying to tell his story for many years, and the mainstream media have ignored him."

Zeifman said Clinton, then 27, was hired to work on the investigation at the behest of her former law professor, Burke Marshall, who also was Sen. Ted Kennedy's chief counsel in the Chappaquiddick case.

When the Watergate probe concluded, Zeifman said, he fired Clinton from the committee staff and refused to give her a letter of recommendation. She was one of only three people who earned that dubious distinction in Zeifman's 17-year career, Calabrese pointed out.

Zeifman told the columnist he fired Clinton because she was a liar.

"She was an unethical, dishonest lawyer," Zeifman said. "She conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the committee and the rules of confidentiality."

more...

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=60962

2 Comments:

Blogger FairestWitness said...

Unbelievably ironic that Hillary Clinton wanted to deny a basic American right; the right to counsel, to a President of the United States. Had she succeeded and Nixon impeached, had he not resigned, then what would that have done to her future President husband in the wake of his massive scandals? Hard to fathom that any lawyer in the United States would try to deny anyone the right to an attorney, especially the President of the United States.

Hillary Clinton, as this so transparently illustrates, does not believe in the rights afforded Americans in the Constitution of the United States. How can she possibly "preserve, protect and defend" it? She doesn't even believe in it!

3:27 PM  
Anonymous cassie said...

We always knew that Hillary was dirty - now we see exactly HOW dirty.

3:34 PM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home