Tuesday, January 23, 2007

A Limbaugh Laugh...

Rush Limbaugh Blasts A Caller:

RUSH: We'll start with Gregg in Wooster, Ohio. Gregg, thanks for waiting and welcome to the program.

CALLER: Hey, how you doing, Rush?

RUSH: Hey never better, sir.

CALLER: Thank you. I want to say, Rush... I want to ask you a question here.

RUSH: Yeah.

CALLER: Why do you push so hard for this New World Order agenda when they send people to Iraq to die by the hundreds, seems like every day, all these Iraqis have suffered and lost their lives for this war that's unjust, and will you stand with me and take a stance and join the Resistance Manifesto (a kook document) against this war?

RUSH: No. I won't.

CALLER: You won't?

RUSH: No. I am not going to join you in the defeat of the United States of America. I'm not going to join you in your distortion of what is happening in Iraq. If you're so concerned about death, will you join me in banning the automobile? If you're so concerned with death, will you join me in holding doctors accountable for poor writing? Faulty prescriptions lead to 7,000 deaths a year. If you are so concerned about death, will you join me and ban emergency rooms, where many, many people die every day.

You, sir, are an embarrassment to me. You are an embarrassment to the country. You have a brain but you don't even use it. It's a sponge for a bunch of anti-American garbage and guilt that you soak up and then you spew it back, making yourself feel important and big and better and smarter than everybody else, when the truth is, if people like you ever end up in control of the country, we are finished! You will give it away in order to make yourself feel good that you are against death.

Three thousand Americans died in two hours on September the 11th. You have forgotten who did it. You have forgotten that they want to continue doing it or you don't believe it or you think we are to blame for it or what have you. But I'm not going to join you in any move that would ensure the defeat of the United States military and this country.

18 Comments:

Blogger JINGOIST said...

I heard this idiot yesterday! WOW! Thanks for posting it.

Morgan

4:38 AM  
Blogger Dave in Oz said...

What the hell does Rush know about "faulty prescriptions" ?? Oh, that's right - Oxycontin and all that.....

Seriously, why do all the Bush groupies keep harping on this garbage that Iraq and 9/11 were and are linked ?? They are not now and never were - Bush has already admitted that Iraq had nothing to do with the attacks on the World Trade Center. Why are more troops being sent there to fight and die for a lie ??

And please don't tell me that if we leave Iraq it'll be "a victory for the terrorists" - Bush has been the best terrorist recruiter al-Qaeda could ever hope for.

Excuse me now - I have to go look for bin Laden - Bush sure as hell won't........

5:22 AM  
Blogger Always On Watch Two said...

People either believe this or not:

Three thousand Americans died in two hours on September the 11th. You have forgotten who did it. You have forgotten that they want to continue doing it or you don't believe it or you think we are to blame for it or what have you.

Dave,
Leaving Iraq will be a victory for the terrorists. It will empower them as the imams will use withdrawal from Iraq as proof of the will of Allah. All Islamic sects are united on that concept.

6:18 AM  
Blogger VerityINK said...

Thanks, AoW2. Dave really is in Oz to believe his libby drivel. Sure, he can take all the swipes at Rush for his drug usage (careful Dave, your tolerance and compassion is showing) that he wants to, but he will never understand the complicated nature of this war, so I'm not even gonna try and explain it to him.

9:06 AM  
Blogger VerityINK said...

Morning, Jingo--where ya been?

9:06 AM  
Blogger Brooke said...

Go Rush! Jerkoffs like that deserve both barrels.

9:31 AM  
Blogger Dave in Oz said...

"Three thousand Americans died in two hours on September the 11th. You have forgotten who did it. You have forgotten that they want to continue doing it or you don't believe it or you think we are to blame for it or what have you."

Absolutely correct - and at first Bush (to his credit) DID go after those who REALLY perpetrated 9/11 - IN AFGHANISTAN.

Then came Iraq - why ?? Again, Bush has already admitted that Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11. If the REAL reason for invading Iraq was that Saddam was a bad man doing bad things to his people, why wasn't that the rationale upfront ?? Maybe all those people wouldn't have been so eager to rush to recruiting stations to join up to "defend our freedom".

And by the way, Rush's "tolerance and compassion" didn't extend much to Michael J Fox, did it ?? A truly tolerant and compassionate person would never have done the "Fox-is-off-his-meds" jelly-wobble Rush did on his show.

Just saying.

1:04 PM  
Blogger Elmer's Brother said...

dave served with your divers in Iraq and it seems to me that one of them has two more balls then you do.

dave google zarqawi in Iraq in 2002 and see that he was making chemical weapons there before the war. Bush was criticized for not going after him and then they criticize him for going after him. Sounds like John Kerry doesn't it.

1:40 PM  
Blogger JINGOIST said...

DONAL I've been working long hours. Right now I'm in the process of downsizing, for mental health reasons. :-) Work has only picked up though.

Dave in oz is a real walking lefty cliche isn't he? One thing unifies all of his "type" though. They are full of misinformation (lefty propaganda) and they HATE! It must really suck being him. LOL!

Morgan

4:48 PM  
Blogger VerityINK said...

Rush does not advertise himself as the quintessential 'party of compassion' the way Dems do, so you may call him on what he said, but he is not likewise a hypocrite as well as being unkind the way the Dems are.

4:50 PM  
Blogger JINGOIST said...

DONAL they (leftists) LOVE to jump on Rush for the Oxycontin thing. I had to take the stuff for a BADLY broken arm once and for the life of me I don't understand how it's possible to get addicted to it. It has many bad side effects.

After thinking it through it makes sense in Rush's case. He has a continuing degenerative back ailment. It's the same sort as my father-in-law Pete who ended up building his own Vax D table. It's an AGONIZING condition that isn't even TOUCHED by over-the-counter meds.
Davey boy doesn't let details like the truth bother him. Remember the one emotion that carries people like him through the day, hatred.

Morgan

5:25 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hey Dave in fucking oz. Iraq:17 UN Resolutions to disarm or hostilites resume. He didn't come claen,the guy turned his country into a truck stop for terrorits. Bush lied? Then the UN did,Keery did,Clinton did(theres a shock) Hans Blix lied,the whole fecking Western world lied about Saddam The people who committed mass murder on 9/11 were Islamofacists,I don't give a fuck were they're killed as long as they don't have to be killed here. Tell us great and powerful oz,after you find bin Laden that is,whats your crowds plan to fight Islamofacist terror? Have you got one or are you just another mealy-mouhted fucking liberal the kind that I've long had it with? Bush is a terrorist recruiter? Good,then we'll just keep killing more of them. Tell me O wise one,you do you want to pre-vail in all this? al-Qeada or the US? And I'm warning you pal,everytime you show up here on my friends web-site I'm going to jumping all over your shit. Johnnymac.

7:01 PM  
Blogger VerityINK said...

LOL! Thank you, J'MAC my good friend--your post has us roaring here, I can't write anymore!

7:21 PM  
Blogger Dave in Oz said...

From the mouth of Rush Limbaugh himself:

I want to let you read along with me a quote from Jerry Colangelo about substance abuse, and I think you'll find that he's very much right…"I know every expert in the world will disagree with me, but I don't buy into the disease part of it. The first time you reach for a substance you are making a choice. Every time you go back, you are making a personal choice. I feel very strongly about that."...

What he's saying is that if there's a line of cocaine here, I have to make the choice to go down and sniff it….And his point is that we are rationalizing all this irresponsibility and all the choices people are making and we're blaming not them, but society for it. All these Hollywood celebrities say the reason they're weird and bizarre is because they were abused by their parents. So we're going to pay for that kind of rehab, too, and we shouldn't. It's not our responsibility. It's up to the people who are doing it. And Colangelo is right.
--Rush Limbaugh TV show (9/23/93)

I have a solution for Mrs. [Jocelyn] Elders. I mean, if she wants to legalize drugs, send the people who want to do drugs to London and Zurich and let's be rid of them. Now...The problem with legalizing drugs is, it's just another abhorrent example of human behavior that we've suddenly decided, "Hey, we can't handle it. We've given up and we're going to sanction the destruction of lives. We're going to let you destroy your life. We're going to make it easy, and then all of us who accept the responsibilities of life and don't destroy our lives on drugs--we'll pay for whatever messes you get into."...

I'm appalled at people who simply want to look at all this abhorrent behavior and say, "Hey, you know, we can't control it anymore. People are going to do drugs anyway. Let's legalize it." It's a dumb idea. It's a rotten idea, and those who are for it are purely, 100 percent selfish.
--Rush Limbaugh TV show (12/9/93)

Now Rush can take Oxycontin (or anything else) until it comes out his wazoo for all I care - just don't be hypocritical about it, OK ?? Don't be publicly against something while secretly doing that same something (no, I'm NOT channelling Mark Foley R-Florida here).

12:43 AM  
Blogger Dave in Oz said...

Re: Zarqawi - just imagine if Bush had listened to the Pentagon in June 2002 or in October and gone after Zarqawi then. No invasion, just surgical airstrikes to knock out the camps - what message would that have sent to al-Qaeda ??

Would the U.S. be in the quagmire it's now in if The Decider had listened to the advice of his military, as he keeps saying he does now ?? He got his wish to be a War President - something I'm sure he now regrets.

Why did he needlessly start something in Iraq when he hadn't finished the job in Afghanistan ???

12:57 AM  
Blogger JINGOIST said...

A few points DIO.
Rush was indeed a hypocrite where drug abuse is concerned. That doesn't erase an AGONIZING back ailment. He STILL has it. Like I said people like yourself just emote and hate, you never comprehend.

The war on terror is going well. There is NO quagmire in Iraq in spite of the best efforts of the American left. Your side betrayed our country badly in Nam and you're doing it again in Iraq. We will prevail against these 7th century barbarians that you so stupidly embolden. The stupidity and treachery of the left will once again cost us thousands more lives than necessary. If history is a teacher, your types will never acknowledge or admit this.

I wish hunting season was broadened to include ACLU lawyers and CAIR spokesmen. They would be summer game though, easier to see without their winter coats. :-)

Morgan

3:49 AM  
Blogger VerityINK said...

Sigh... Let me give this geography/poly sci lecture one more time... Osama isn't in Afghanistan--he's in Pakistan's northern territories. Musharraf does not rule there--Pakistani warlords DO--and they are the ones that have said no special ops/Americans can come in here.

Musharraf leads, and is alive, only by the slimmest margin. The help he already gives us has put his life in danger; he has suffered MANY assassination attempts. Were he to help us any more/allow us into the north, there would very probably be a coup and he would be killed.

Pakistan has nukes--and they are always into it with India (who also has nukes). Were there to be a coup in Pakistan, or were we to simply recklessly go into the north absent Musharraf's or the warlord's permission, someone could get jumpy and a nuke could fly. India could very well respond in kind. Thus, the entire Indian subcontinent could erupt in nuclear warfare.

Now, are we supposed to risk all of that simply to get bin Laden--or ANY one man? At this point, bin Laden, if he's even alive, is contained, he no threat.

The USA is trying to NOT be imperialistic, or selfish, by abiding the wishes that we stay out of the north region. Isn't that what you Demmies are always saying we should be?

THAT'S why President Bush has not 'gone after' bin Laden and, instead, chose to do other needed work--like against the Taliban in Afghanistan, and Saddam in Iraq.

This war on terror has many sides to it. As in any war, the battle is waged in many places. I do not understand how anyone on the Left can be so ignorant about warfare to not realize that.

You people would wage WWII in El Alamein, the Hurtgen Forest, Midway, Omaha Beach, Eniwetok etc. and not realize they were all part of the same war.

I am not so stupid.

4:38 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hey OZzie,did you find bin Laden yet? What isn't finished in Afganistan? Haven't noticed the Taliban back in power,have you? "War President'? No President ever goes looking for a war. Tell me Poindexter,when Bill "BJ" Clinton was bombing the piss out of Serbia,without a UN Resolution,where was your crowd calling him a ''war president''? What threat did Serbai pose to us? J'Mac

2:11 PM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home