Hillary Says Terror Would Be GOP Boost
By Geoff Earle
Sen. Hillary Clinton yesterday raised the prospect of a terror attack before next year's election, warning that it could boost the GOP's efforts to hold on to the White House.
Discussing the possibility of a new nightmare assault while campaigning in New Hampshire, Clinton also insisted she is the Democratic candidate best equipped to deal with it.
"It's a horrible prospect to ask yourself, 'What if? What if?' But if certain things happen between now and the election, particularly with respect to terrorism, that will automatically give the Republicans an advantage again...
more...
Imagine, Hillary's biggest concern about terrorism is how it would impact the election she wants to win! Is she trying to send a message to the terrorists, or what? They know that, if she is elected, they'll have an easier time of it--just like they did under her husband...
posted by VerityINK at 10:02 AM
Information:
10 Comments:
This woman has the most appalling lack of conscience I've ever seen.
To think of her as president is a horrible joke!
Yes, she can deal with it as successfully as her husband did.
She is so locked in her box she can't imagine that not having a terror attack could also benefit the GOP because it will show that the GOP is on top of things.
This awful remark of hers should be the cement block that will get her to sink in her murky waters.
Question: How long was Bill Clinton in office before the first attack on WTC?
Answer: 28 days...so class, do we blame GHWB?
I still say this comment will come back to haunt her. It shows what most people already suspect of her -- she is aloof and disconnected from ordinary people. Combine that isolation with her well-known temper and you have a dangerous person in charge of the "football" -- if the American voter is crazy enough to elect her, that is.
Isn't it scary that ANY of the Democratic candidates would be dangerous in the Oval Office?
Les, the 1993 attack on the WTC was the 1st terrorist bombing attack on American soil. Prior to that event, all other attacks had occurred overseas. So your correlation about the time in office before the attack happened and blaming the previous administration doesn't wash. But I'm sure you already know this. President Clinton isn't responsible for that attack either. Except that his handling of the aftermath was a complete and total pooch-screw. He and his administration decided it was not an act of war, just a group of unlawful individuals with no state sponsorship who carried out the attack. A matter for our criminal justice system to dispose of. Like I said, a total pooch-screw.
No, LessAnonymous, you all don't blame GHWB - you usually skip right over him and try to pin everything on Reagan.
Let's assume that Les is right, that it was Bush the elder's fault for not preparing the nation for a terrorist attack on our soil. Clinton had eight years to learn from that mistake. He never learned.
Of the two, I find Clinton the most blameworthy, for (we're still holding the assumption true) Bush messed up once. Clinton messed up again and again and again, with numerous documented appeasements of the jihadis.
Les, your life as an online target has got to suck, man. I mean, whenever you pop up you get the rhetorical equivalent of "daisy-cutters" dropped on you every time. Do you really need to be slapped around that badly?
Poor RS, hiding behind the skirts of Donal so no one can give him a cyber wedgie...
Donal, As you can see RS is a big boy who no longer needs you to protect him...
Yes Russet
It is clinton.
Years of every mistae in the book in his private life - not so private when the abused women started to show up on our TVS-and in his public life when the terror attacks started to show up and not musch was done about them.
Even the fact that the CIA was lying to him and to us is his fault.He should have been on top of it .He should have fired the useless clowns.
His friendship with ARAFAT is beyond being called a mistake . It was an abomination.He dragged big America to the gutter.
I will never forgive him for what he did to Israel .
Basically , he brought us shame and sorrow on top of more and more terror .
Big America could not take care of a little snake called MUSLIM TERROR? ?Sure she could if she had her pants on and her thinking cap ON too.
batya
Post a Comment
<< Home