Democrat Distemper Defines the Day:
What Would Happen From A Publicized "Honk For Impeachment" Campaign
Beep your horn every five seconds or so. Keep beeping as you keep driving.
That'd be a lot of fucking horns, wouldn't it?
Cacaphony across America. (Bozita)
DU Chimes In:
--I think the idea has appeal, since the car horn is considered an emergency warning device (great tie-in to the war). But misuse of car horns can also land ya in trouble.
In Seattle, misuse of a car horn can result in a $124 fine. In Illinois, the state law says, "The driver of a motor vehicle shall, when reasonably necessary to insure safe operation, give audible warning with his horn but shall not otherwise use such horn when upon a highway."
--If I heard horns while being issued a ticket, I'd consider it worthwhile.
--I'd do it, too, because I also have the money to pay a ticket for blowing my horn in public protest.
-- I don't have much $$$, but I'd consider it a bargain. Not a lot of cops would pull you over when over half of the cars are honking.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x1823947
These selfish baby anarchist-wannabes don't mind putting everyone else in danger, drawing resources needed from legitimate victims, drowning out properly-used warning beeps, or causing no end to misunderstandings and traffic jams--as long as they have their tantrum flavor-of-the-week!
Just like with the stupid "Die-In"; how many people who really needed the police on Saturday, in D.C., were able to get the help they needed? How many weren't because police had to guard the Capitol, prevent willfully provocative acting-out, and diaper Cindy Sheehan's mouth?
The last joker gave away any last shred of moral compass he had when he tried to justified the misuse by saying, "If enough of us do it, there'll be too many of us to get caught!"
Jeez, don't these people have any internal standards of what's right and wrong, responsible and irresponsible (or does asking that make me part of the 'Establishment'???) Who was that dude singing "And the Times Are A-Changin"? They haven't changed at all.
The DUerSewer did get one thing right, though; all those stupid honking Leftistas would truly make some 'caca-phony'!
(FYI BOZITA: Go buy the book "Spell Check Is Our Friend!" It'll open up a whole new world for ya...)
posted by VerityINK at 1:49 AM
Information:
19 Comments:
Before LES runs in here, all out of breath and cranky, sputtering "b-bu-buuutttt only a few people commented!", or "do you know how many comment threads there are at DU?" Let me stipulate that I agree and state that my point was not to note how many commented or how fast a thread goes...
For easy-reading, let me explain that my point was to give an example of how selfish, self-centered, anachronistic--and just plain silly the protest actions of the Left are.
If you couple this post with what we've been hearing for months--if not years--and the actions in D.C. we saw this weekend, then it will be obvious that these attitudes are endemic in the Democrat/Lefty party.
Thanks for admitting to that Donal. There are hundreds and hundreds of discussions every day there. They literally start every couple of seconds so yes, just like the wingers who want to bludgeon people representing the majority of Americans view about the war, there are people on the left who want to beep their car horns for peace. I prefer the car horns to the baseball bats to be honest with you.
I have a really BAD headache, and I'm supposed to have ac people replacing ductwork today, so les, I'M NOT IN THE MOOD FOR CHILDISH BEHAVIOR! And if some idiots start, I may use a baseball bat and break the horns of ANY idiots who start bleeping away!
Your(and your leftista comwads)are annoying and tiresome on my best day. TODAY, I have no patience for spoiled brats who were raised according to Dr. Spock, and never taught; consideration, manners, compassion(on a practical level)or critical thinking skills.
If you want a '60's redux, go into your corner, get stoned and SHUT UP!
tmw
Or hum quietly to yourself!
Les I prefer the baseball bats for the people (maggot-infested leftists) who think it's OK to deface the Vietnam heroes memorial. It's the ONLY thing they understand since decency and simple respect are way beyond their grasp!
GREAT comment TMW!@
Morgan
And your evidence that it was the left defacing the memorial?
You have a good point les, it was probably card-carrying conservatives. Oy
Morgan
Morgan, I agree, TMW's comments-- her whole post--was WONDERFUL! I had no idea she did some of her best writing with a bad headache, a torn up house, and a sulky Leftist in front of her!
LES--Can you provide even one SHRED of rationale for why a RIGHTWINGER would want to deface the Wall? (And then take pains to have GOE, and many other fellow Ringtist concerns, find out about it, publicize it, speak out against it, and devote their enerngies and money to stop it from every happening again?)
You see, Les, this is a great example of exactly how you Leftists operate. I haven't heard you take responsibility for ONE BLESSED THING ANYONE ON YOUR SIDE HAS EVER DONE--while we Republicans take out our own trash, admit the President has made some mistakes, and regularly take our wrongdoers to the woodshed. Where's YOUR testicular fortitude?
Even a rat--a rodent--will not steal food off your diningroom table WHILE you're having dinner. No, he'll wait until nobody's in the room and THEN he'll do it. Well, the Leftist scum that defaced the Wall surely was as smart.... as that rat.
I must say, though, that if the improbable occurs and a Rightwinger DID do it, it was mighty nice of y'all--ALL you on the Left--to keep so very quiet about it, never mentioning it amongst yourselves, never saying a harsh word about it, and certainly NEVER protesting it or let the media know about it...
P.S. And, actually, Les, it's not a matter of 'admitting' certain things or not. I always, as near as is humanely possible, strive to have a 100% source disclosure on this site. I leave NOTHING to guess-work or chance. Thus, I don't have to 'admit' what is in plain sight for everyone to see at the outset.
The facts speak for themselves and do not diminish my point, but MAKE it.
FYI: The very simple, low-key hypothetical I posted at DU you keep mentioning as my 'baiting' DU has been on my sidebar since day one--as is everything I have written. It's called "Doomsday Hypothetical and DU's Answers". I 'baited' no one--the very thought is laughable--you can go there and see for yourself, as can anyone.
Their answers stand verbatim.
"LES--Can you provide even one SHRED of rationale for why a RIGHTWINGER would want to deface the Wall?"
Simple, because they hate America and Americans...
Next question.
Seriously, can you provide one shred of evidence that all of the claims you have been making are true? Of course not, but it fits into your (not you directly donal, but many of your posters) world view that everything bad that happens is somehow politically motivated by the progressive majority of Americans. I hate to break this to you but about the only people who find some political agenda in everything they do and believe are the folks posting here and maybe Newt Gingrich.
Donal, as far as baiting goes, you went there looking for material for your blog. You got it. Nothing to be ashamed of at all. But you went in with leading questions waiting for the answers you knew in advance you wanted to post over here. Again, nothing wrong with that but I appreciate your honesty.
http://irate-nation.com/blog1/2007/09/16/official-elitist/
I think that this is the pledge that less signed...
tmw
LES: One--Rightwingers are the ones who want to PRESERVE and DEFEND this country, Les. We're the ones who think America is the best country in the world. We're not ashamed of America in any way, shape, or form--and we think those overseas who 'don't like us (while taking plenty of aid from us) are just plain silly. We're the ones willing to die to keep us safe,free---and to bring democracy to other nations so they'll be as well off as we are--that's not 'hating' anybody or anything.
Two--I've never--in the year+ I've been blogging--heard ANYBODY here say 'that everything bad that happens is politically motivated by the progressive majority of Americans', so you'll have to prove that by pointing it out and providing a URL. If you can't do that, then you'd better get help for your deluded belief system, poor listening skills, and rank paranoia.
Everything here seems to have a political agenda to you, Les because this is a political blog LOL!
I'm sorry you feel that asking the people at DU a legitimate question is 'baiting them to get material for my blog'. Actually, the thing is simpler than that: I ask a question. They answer. I post my question and their answers--and the cards fall where they may.
You cannot blame THEIR answers--and their poor showing on me; because I asked the question in THEIR backyard they were among friends and supporters and were free to answer anyway they chose.
A Leftwinger OR Rightwinger could've asked the same question I did. For your accusation to be true, they'd have to answer differently when a Rightie asked ('baiting', according to you) then when a Lefty asked ('non-baiting', according to you) the same question.
In other words, you're making their answers dependent upon--not the question--but, rather, who asked it. Now, really, Les, are you Demmies really that dumb? LOL!
They thought I WAS a Lefty when I asked it (indeed, several of them stated that they'd faced the same question there before from their compatriots). Thus, their answers couldn't have been skewed towards anything other than exactly what they meant and wanted to say.
Lester, I read Donal's sidebar piece and you're 100% wrong. She simply asked them what would they do if Amadinejad said he was going to drop a nuke on us in 3 days. How is that 'leading'?
(I suppose she could've asked them what they thought Amadinejad would do 3 days from now when he first woke up in the morning, but that wouldn't have been very interesting, now would it?)
Why don't you give us an example of how YOU'D reword the question so it wasn't 'leading'... (I bet a hundred dollars he won't touch this one! he he he). The question is simple: Amadinejad says he will drop a nuke on us in 3 days, what would you do if you were POTUS?
TMW--You're on a roll today! That was a great list I dedicate THIS one to LES ISMORE:
45. Whenever someone says something that rubs your prejudgements the wrong way, ignore the contents of the remarks and vilify, defame, malign and slander that person while claiming everything that person has ever said or will ever utter is wrong. You are encouraged to take cheap shots and engage in name-calling and ad hominem attacks, but, above all, if you’re a true standard-bearer for the Elitist Leftwing Liberals, avoid discussing issues you can’t debate - which are, of course, all of them.
This is LES comin' and goin'!
LES: A SONG FOR THE LEFT:
http://mfile.akamai.com/5020/wma/
rushlimb.download.akamai.com/50
20/New/wehatetheusa.asx
(Copy and paste together,if need be.)
LAST CHANCE LES--either address the issues brought up in my looong, thoughtful answers to you or I will limit myself to three sentence answers to you from now on.
I simply do not have the time to waste trying to talk to someone who doesn't have the guts to answer me.
"Two--I've never--in the year+ I've been blogging--heard ANYBODY here say 'that everything bad that happens is politically motivated by the progressive majority of Americans'"
Look no further than the defaced Viet Nam Vet memorial posts or the slashed tires post. Everything was blamed on "lefties".
Patsy, it wasnt the original question is was the leading, loaded questions that followed. As I said in my post, it is nothing to be ashamed of (or a poor showing on you), it just is what it is. You put on your disguise to go harvest some quotes. I put RS posts up on our departmental bulletin board sometimes. The difference is that we know RS doesnt represent anything other than RS. And that poor nitwit at DU doesnt represent anyone or anything other than himself. Projecting some cheetoes eating kids ideas to the majority of Americans who support Democratic values is like saying Morgans rants represent Republicans. Thats all.
LES, you said:
'"Two--I've never--in the year+ I've been blogging--heard ANYBODY here say 'that everything bad that happens is politically motivated by the progressive majority of Americans'"
Look no further than the defaced Viet Nam Vet memorial posts or the slashed tires post. Everything was blamed on "lefties"
LES, your logic escapes you entirely. Yes, we blame the Lefties for the Wall defacement. We've heard them say they'll do it, people in D.C. have seen them deface other monmuments, GOE--most especially conservative and made up of vets--goes there specifically to defendit from YOU PEOPLE.
But that is only one example--it in no way is a statement that we think 'EVERYTHING BAD' happens because of youfolks. Surely, you know the difference between ONE example and EVERYTHING, don't you, Les?
P.S We all see that you're trying to bait Morgan into a fight (though you run from his points everytime he engages you like you run from mine). However, I'm safe in saying we'd be nothing but proud if Morgan DID represent the entire Republican Party; I don't mind a real man at all--I married one!
That's SO nice of you to say DONAL! Paul is a lucky guy.
Morgan
Post a Comment
<< Home