Dems Can't Even Spell "JIHAD"
By IBD
War On Terror: If the New Hampshire debates settled anything, it's which party has the stomach to take on radical Islam. The Democrats couldn't even identify the enemy. Not once. Really.
We scanned the transcripts of Saturday's debates hosted by ABC News and tallied up the references to Islamic terrorism. The rhetorical divide between Democrats and Republicans on that score alone — ignoring the yawning gaps in policy — is stunning.
None of the four Democrat presidential candidates — despite running for an office that demands they lead the ongoing global war against Islamic extremists — could bring himself or herself to define the enemy we face as Islamic.
Their combined references to "Islam" or "Islamic" totaled zero — even though moderator Charles Gibson prompted them with a question about "Islamic radicals" threatening the U.S. with nuclear terrorism.
But Democrats refused to go there. Out of respect for their constituency, there was a complete blackout regarding Islamic jihad.Instead, Hillary Clinton defined the enemy generically as "stateless terrorists," while Barack Hussein Obama complained about the "politics of fear" that he thinks accurately defining the enemy has created.
John Edwards, meanwhile, continued to wage his own personal jihad against a phantom enemy of "irresponsible" corporations — from pharmaceutical and insurance companies to oil giants and multinational corporations.
Republicans, on the other hand, called the enemy by its proper name.
more...
http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=284601335178058
posted by VerityINK at 3:28 AM
Information:
4 Comments:
Great article DONAL! IBD usually gets it right and this one points out yet again that the Dems can't be trusted to fight allah's gangsters. It seems Edwards would put tanks on Wall Street!
Morgan
This article has "scary" running all through it! The Democrats need to realize that Republicans are not their "enemy." Islam is! Islam is the enemy of everyone who is non-muslim.
Morgan...I love your phrase "allah's gangsters." That is exactly what they are. I think Mohammed would be laughing at what he alone created!
You could hardly imagine the Dems, who have consistently and steadfastly oppossing every effort to fight Islamic terror, voted time and again against funding the war in Iraq, continually called our troops ''nazis'' and ''murderers, a low-rent bunch of scabs and losers who have spun more postive propaganda for the jihadis than al_Jahzeera are about to stand up and denounce their proxy campaign aids. No sir, jihad is never a word that will pass any Dems lips. Never. J'Mac.
Post a Comment
<< Home