Wednesday, June 11, 2008



In a conversation recently, I mentioned as an aside what a great president George Bush has been and my friend was surprised. I was surprised that he was surprised.

I generally don't write columns about the manifestly obvious, but, yes, the man responsible for keeping Americans safe from another terrorist attack on American soil for nearly seven years now will go down in history as one of America's greatest presidents.

Produce one person who believed, on Sept. 12, 2001, that there would not be another attack for seven years, and I'll consider downgrading Bush from "Great" to "Really Good."

Merely taking out Saddam Hussein and his winsome sons Uday and Qusay (Hussein family slogan: "We're the Rape Room People!") constitutes a greater humanitarian accomplishment than anything Bill Clinton ever did -- and I'm including remembering Monica's name on the sixth sexual encounter.

But unlike liberals, who are so anxious to send American troops to Rwanda or Darfur, Republicans oppose deploying U.S. troops for purely humanitarian purposes. We invaded Iraq to protect America.

It is unquestionable that Bush has made this country safe by keeping Islamic lunatics pinned down fighting our troops in Iraq. In the past few years, our brave troops have killed more than 20,000 al-Qaida and other Islamic militants in Iraq alone. That's 20,000 terrorists who will never board a plane headed for JFK -- or a landmark building, for that matter.

We are, in fact, fighting them over there so we don't have to fight them at, say, the corner of 72nd and Columbus in Manhattan -- the mere mention of which never fails to enrage liberals, which is why you should say it as often as possible.

The Iraq war has been a stunning success. The Iraqi army is "standing up" (as they say), fat Muqtada al-Sadr --the Dr. Phil of Islamofascist radicalism -- has waddled off in retreat to Iran, and Sadr City and Basra are no longer war zones. Our servicemen must be baffled by the constant nay-saying coming from their own country.

The Iraqis have a democracy -- a miracle on the order of flush toilets in that godforsaken region of the world. Despite its newness, Iraq's democracy appears to be no more dysfunctional than one that would condemn a man who has kept the nation safe for seven years while deifying a man who has accomplished absolutely nothing in his entire life except to give speeches about "change."

(Guess what Bill Clinton's campaign theme was in 1992? You are wrong if you guessed: "bringing dignity back to the White House." It was "change." In January 1992, James Carville told Steve Daley of The Chicago Tribune that it had gotten to the point that the press was complaining about Clinton's "constant talk of change.")

Monthly casualties in Iraq now come in slightly lower than a weekend with Anna Nicole Smith. According to a CNN report last week, for the entire month of May, there were only 19 troop deaths in Iraq. (Last year, five people on average were shot every day in Chicago.) With Iraqi deaths at an all-time low, Iraq is safer than Detroit -- although the Middle Eastern food is still better in Detroit.

Al-Qaida is virtually destroyed, surprising even the CIA. Two weeks ago, The Washington Post reported: "Less than a year after his agency warned of new threats from a resurgent al-Qaida, CIA Director Michael V. Hayden now portrays the terrorist movement as essentially defeated in Iraq and Saudi Arabia and on the defensive throughout much of the rest of the world, including in its presumed haven along the Afghanistan-Pakistan border."

It's almost as if there's been some sort of "surge" going on, as strange as that sounds.
Just this week, The New York Times reported that al-Qaida and other terrorist groups in Southeast Asia have all but disappeared, starved of money and support. The U.S. and Australia have been working closely with the Philippines, Malaysia and Indonesia, sending them counterterrorism equipment and personnel.

But no one notices when 9/11 doesn't happen. Indeed, if we had somehow stopped the 9/11 attack, we'd all be watching Mohammed Atta being interviewed on MSNBC, explaining his lawsuit against the Bush administration. Maureen Dowd would be writing columns describing Khalid Sheik Mohammed as a "wannabe" terrorist being treated like Genghis Khan by an excitable Bush administration.

We begin to forget what it was like to turn on the TV, see a tornado, a car chase or another Pamela Anderson marriage and think: Good -- another day without a terrorist attack.
But liberals have only blind hatred for Bush -- and for those brute American interrogators who do not supply extra helpings of bearnaise sauce to the little darlings at Guantanamo with sufficient alacrity.

The sheer repetition of lies about Bush is wearing people down. There is not a liberal in this country worthy of kissing Bush's rear end, but the weakest members of the herd run from Bush. Compared to the lickspittles denying and attacking him, Bush is a moral giant -- if that's not damning with faint praise. John McCain should be so lucky as to be running for Bush's third term. Then he might have a chance.


Anonymous Anonymous said...

OUTSTANDING article DONAL! That's the best darn article I've read in a long time and George W. Bush deserves HEAPS of praise for that alone! I'm partial to Ann anyways, but this one was a keeper. She's right, WHO in their right mind would say on 9-12 that major terrorist attacks on America would be over with for the next 7 years?


6:01 PM  
Blogger CHOMP said...

Big Wow! Ann Coulter can write the most fascinating columns. And she is right about being safe from Al Qaida for several years. With the Democrats snatching more power, I will have to worry again about our safety. I will have to worry about a lot of things!

9:15 PM  
Blogger VerityINK said...

I love our Annie! She sure nailed this one!

9:55 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

she is spot on!

2:23 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Of course who counts the years from 1993 until 2001 when there were no attacks on America soil until a Republican took office that is...wonder why. Oh, wait, there was that right winger Timothy McVeigh but we dont count that right?

Maybe Al Quaeda knew the new President would be asleep at the wheel almost immediately.

Your pal,

1:47 PM  
Blogger VerityINK said...


No, all our installations overseas were hit, stupid. Maybe having our soldiers killed overseas doesn't count for YOU but it sure does with right-thinking people.

BTW, Clinton opened the door and allowed 911, so don't gloat too soon. Clinton's got better than 3000 deaths on his heads--as do ALL you Demmies for your lousy policies and weakening our military that's led to the entire issue of terrorism on our shores AND on us and others abroad (you know, all those people you don't think need counting?)

Your dear Clintons can have more words, too, Hutus-Tutsis.

2:08 PM  
Blogger VerityINK said...

Tim McVeigh was no rightwinger--he was against the government, Les. Oh, he PAINTED himself in those terms to justify what he did (and overseas) but that's not what he was.

A true 'rightwinger' would NEVER have done what he did--only lousy Leftists, Communists, anarchists, Democrat party member, Progressives, Liberals do stuff like that.

2:11 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Very nice post. I just stumbled upon your blog
and wanted to say that I have truly enjoyed browsing your blog posts.
In any case I will be subscribing to your rss feed and I hope you
write again soon!

Here is my web blog ... bistromd

7:15 AM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home